Opinion? What's that?
Published on September 3, 2008 By kryo In Internet

Ah, Wikipedia. Savior of internet debaters and bane of those who try to set themselves in a positive light against the connected masses. And now, apparently, the Department of Homeland Security is relying on it to reinforce their own legal arguments. Or maybe not.

It seems that the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals had to tell the DHS and the Board of Immigration Appeals that Wikipedia is no excuse for evidence to use in their proceedings. In this particular case, an Ethiopian woman had entered with false papers, seeking asylum. The DHS and Immigration dutifully looked up her real papers from back home on Wikipedia and decided (based on the wiki article about the documents she was using) that they weren't good enough proof of identity.

You'd think that it should be common sense--Wikipedia is great for learning about stuff in general when you're bored, but given that there's no requirement of actual knowledge in order to edit entries there, it's pretty commonly agreed that it shouldn't be used for anything where documentation and proof are important.

But with the government and anything internet-related, it seems more often than not that sense is anything but common...


Comments (Page 2)
5 Pages1 2 3 4  Last
on Sep 04, 2008

They are de facto security risks and should be dealt with by physical and documentation/credentialling barriers.Catch them, tattoo thier forehead, and send them packing, right? 

No, Zu....By "physical and documentation/credentialling barriers" I mmean The fence, and documentation that is extremely "forgery proof" such as retinal photos and finger prints.

You can't be serious about branding.

on Sep 04, 2008

Because we can use them as slave labor to help build the wall, silly!

Little-Whip, that's unconstitutional and illegal. Our security is our responsibility to create and maintain. I'm upset about a US President that "for some reason" (his corporate moneyed buddies) can't fulfill his oath as President to preserve and protect.... and the pretend to be Mr. Security and try to paint the Democrats as weak on the enemy. B.S.!!!!!

 

on Sep 04, 2008

Ok so ..wait.....what.....oh yeah... wikipedia... courts....thats right.  Sorry couldn't remember for a minute what the thread was about.

 

And yeah that was pretty idiotic of them to try.

on Sep 05, 2008

So i take it, then, in my bid to prove aliens intend a hostile takeover of the World, my referencing wikipedia's reference to the Borg isn't gonna convince anyone?

Dammit, I'll have to turn to my Stargate SG1 magazines for evidence, then.

on Sep 05, 2008

my referencing wikipedia's reference to the Borg isn't gonna convince anyone?

I beleive it!  Damn Borg cant even respect pirates.

on Sep 05, 2008

So why would it be illegal or unconstitutional to do the same to illegal immigrants?

It shouldn't be... and if they refuse to work, put 'em in a vaporising chamber and use the collected energy to reduce our need for fossil fuels.

on Sep 05, 2008

Many states compell prisoners to work on chain gangs, cleaning up roadways or doing other types of heavy labor, and there's nothing illegal about it.

Well, then I suppose you don't mind allying yourself to various historic regimes who engaged in "forced" or "Punitive Labor" .... the examples run from the Germans and Japanese (WWII) to the Soviets, Communist Chinese, and others.

I do, despite the 13th Amendment. How ironic to abolish and re-establish forced/bonded/punitive labor in one stroke!

I'd rather see Americans get jobs that could support their families with dignity, and prisoners get truely rehabilitated. That may be a pipe dream, but we should aim towards that, no?

I believe that it is impossible to force people to do competent work, and that the archaic thinking that produces a slave class (no matter what the "justification" is: Biblical or other) is immoral.

Simple expulsion for illegal aliens is enough provided they have paid taxes on what they have earned, and pay their ticket back. If they commit a crime, jail time in their OWN country. Each prisoner runs us about $50,000 a year. How's their labor going to pay that off? I don't see a fence builder or highway cleaner earning $50,000 a year.

Incidently, being 'Liberal' or 'Conservative' is not an insult. Last time I looked, we were still free to choose our belief and political regime.

I can say, though that I would fight to the death for your freedom to express your thoughts as I would hope you'd do fo me and mine.

on Sep 05, 2008

The key word here in illegal aliens is "ILLEGAL" that pretty much sums it up for me

on Sep 05, 2008

jpmurph1
The key word here in illegal aliens is "ILLEGAL" that pretty much sums it up for me

Exactly, so how do our constitutional rights apply to them, if they aren't even citizens? As far as I'm concerned, the ONLY thing they are "entitiled" to us a bus ride back over the border.

on Sep 05, 2008

Where  is the line between illegal immigrant and foreign invader crossed? Living next to Area 51 for many years,I can tell you that IR cameras,ground motion sensors and armed,well trained guards  and attack dogs WILL keep the wrong people on their side of the boarder"Use of deadly force is authorized" and Humvees with 50 cal machine guns do a great job of educating the public.

Wanna come to America? Do it the same way millions of others,including my great-grandparents did.Legally.They came looking for a better life,not demanding that one be given to them.

on Sep 05, 2008

boarder
  Zubish?  

on Sep 05, 2008

Compelling those who have broken our laws to be productive enough to cover the costs of their incarceration does not equate with slavery, despite the fact that I used the term 'slave labor' to describe it.
(empahasis mine)

You seem to think that teaching them a blue collar trade, compelling them to work to pay for their own upkeep, while providing for their every need from shelter to food and medical care is akin to torture.

No, I'd rather see the jobs go to honest Americans. I would rather see them GO HOME (are you in the 'listen' mode yet?). They cannot 'earn'enough to cover their cost. That's the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.

Then you're absolutely clueless in regards to how much these FEDERAL jobs pay. Unskilled laborers can earn $25-40 per hour.

And I'd like to see that going to honest, American citizens. No prisoner gets paid on a Federal Employee pay scale. That's not only unbelievable, it downright wacky.

Check your facts before arguing with me.

Or what you believe are "the facts".

 

on Sep 06, 2008

I have little faith in my government and congress.  I am surprized that someone used Wiki for actual research, it is more hearsay.

Highlight below to read my take on (illegals issue).  I put it on this color because it is WAY off track from the aticle refered to in these commets.

My 2 cents...(illegals) stop wasting money on wars that are not handled well at all (Recent conflicts) and losing  wooden crates of money.  Then we can start taking a look at our borders.

If we can't solve a illegal aliens coming to our own border illegally why are we so interested in fighting wars everywhere else?  Take Care of our home before we mess other peoples homes/lives  up.

Then, improve our actual agencies (FBI, CIA, National Guard, etc) then get rid of Homeland Security/Defense.  National Guard is ONLY for our nations Defemce NOT to be sent over to Iraq or AAfganistan. 

FBI are invertigators of our highest level in our own country.  Improve their department so that they have a more people on their payscale to patrol our borders where needed. 

We'd also have and surplus money to spend on improving the borders through practicle means or other ways.  Imagine if we can improve the FBI CIA, and National Guard how much better our borders will be without ANY needs for a overlapping, redundent agency known as Homeland Security.  We really have so many redudent agencies in our country  that are so useless that the country needs to look at if they are being effective.  We improve our current agencies and get rid of the agencies that overlap each other that make things more confusing and double standards.   Our agencies will also be able to react quicker as they don't need to go tyhrough so many different department/opther agencies.

 

on Sep 07, 2008

Why is that text white, I can hardly see it.

on Sep 07, 2008

Why is that text white, I can hardly see it.

I had the same problem 'til I put on my Elton John designed rode coloured glasses... then I could read every word without a problem.

 

Basically, Zolop was saying that the US is over-governed, over-administrated and losing control over important domestic issues for others that arent.

Same here in Oz... don't matter which Party's in Office, we are over-governed and have a huge bureaucracy that takes eons to accomplish anything and couldn't organise a piss-up in a brewery..

5 Pages1 2 3 4  Last