Bebi...highlight it and you will be able to read it. The poster did it this way as he (or she) thinks it is off topic.

I've noticed an assumption that most esoteric systems seem to take for granted.  It's so fundamental that it's hard to state and even harder to challenge, but one way of putting it might be that if things can be divided into a small number of categories, then those categories must be equal, balanced, and symmetrical. Equality, balance, and symmetry are taken as a description:  people assume that things in the world really are equal, balanced, and symmetrical by nature.
------------
Tanyaa

I agree with paratid you cant't show an wiki article as proof , I certainly accept that wiki is great source of information.

=============================================================================

shinyallard

Are those the Jack Kerouac glasses?

Trust you to pick up on my typos... Zubish, it seems, has penetrated deep into the fabric of Stardock society, so with the edit button often MIA or AWOL, even the best of us are gonna get sprung, having performed uneditable Zubisms.

As for the glasses, they were rose coloured Elton john specials... which obviously means I never wear them in public. 

I thought I read somewhere (in Wikipedia?) that the Bush administration was paying Mexico under the "Rent a Peasant" program to bring illegals into the US in order to destabilize the economy. Something about making this another third world country or something like that. An unnamed source indicated that the ten million plus immigrants save businesses billions of dollars in underpaid wages, health benefits, vacation and sick leave while continuing to charge the middle class the expenses (taxes) of all the other legal activities against the illegals such as deportation and/or incarceration and placing more Americans on the unemployment line.

another anonymous source stated that this coupled along with the billions being spent on war and the recent upsurge in home ownership by the banking industry will help to eradicate the middle class altogether. Thus bringing about a more acceptable societal model of "haves" and "have nots".

While all of this is tongue in cheek, there may be some truth in this. It does seem that the current administration is hell bent upon bankrupting this country. With all of the recent failures in the banking/investment industry I hope that all of you young bucks and buckettes can see why privitization of the social security benefits would have been a bad thing.

anyone want to discuss Walmart??

Where does the US Constitution say that it only applies to citizens?

Aye, Capn  Been dry so long, me mind cant help but wit me.

You and ParaTed2K seem to be in a contest to become the least civil person in the forums. You're entitled to your opinion and to express it politely. 

You are not entitled to abuse others.

You sure you got the right thread?

Well it seems t' I, then, us'd better git tha Sister afloat n' waylay a rum trader fer 'e.

little whip... this comment/attitude is provocative and antagonistic, not to mention arrogant and totally unnecessary.  If your forum participation must revolve around trying to upset people to get a rise, then perhaps you should seek elsewhere to practice the sport.  You may think this does not violate the JU ToU, but it does (constitutional rights do not extend to abusing others on a privately owned site) and is NOT welcome on JU or any of the other Stardock forums.

Yeah, I know, I'll be next on your hit list,, but I recommend against it and propose you consider a more demeanor in your communications with others on these forums.

I've always been a sort of out there person so just to let you know, I've passed this up to the mods. I hope others take the hint and do so also.

Done!

While heated debates are more than welcome, everyone please refrain from personal attacks as they are against site rules.

You can attack the commets at hand, not those posting them.